No info on golf/Wynn, but I don't think pollution would be a stopper: the Gateway property is fully-capped: the reason you drive uphill to get to Gateway's parking is that the whole site has something like 10' of capping dirt. The retaining walls and slopes are all the edge of the dirt cap.[rumor says] Wynn bought the Gateway property and intends to build a golf course. I'm not sure how considering the land is heavily polluted.
A deal would make a lot of sense for both Wynn and the owners of The Gateway Center (assuming the prophets of doom about the demise of big box stores are correct). Strike while the iron is hot and all that.
What if Boston relocated the Convention center towards this area right between Assembly, Wellington and the Casino. Any thoughts?
Yes: that is preposterously asinine statement on a number of levels.
1.) The area "right between Assembly, Wellington, and the Casino" is the Mystic River. Are you proposing some kind of floating/pontoon-based convention center?
2.) Why on earth would the municipality of Boston, which enjoys annually the benefits of hundreds of millions of dollars from having conventions within its boundaries, ever agree/desire to relocate its convention to another municipality and lose that huge amount of revenue/tax base?
3.) For that matter, how on earth could one municipality even propose, from a legal standpoint, that it would graft a convention center onto a separate municipality? Would Somerville have any say in that?
Please, try to think a little before you post...
I'm not that confident that WYNN is able to buy the Gateway Plaza. I believe that Plaza is successful and WYNN would definitely have to pay serious premium.
What if Boston relocated the Convention center towards this area right between Assembly, Wellington and the Casino. Any thoughts?
Yes: that is preposterously asinine statement on a number of levels.
1.) The area "right between Assembly, Wellington, and the Casino" is the Mystic River. Are you proposing some kind of floating/pontoon-based convention center?
2.) Why on earth would the municipality of Boston, which enjoys annually the benefits of hundreds of millions of dollars from having conventions within its boundaries, ever agree/desire to relocate its convention to another municipality and lose that huge amount of revenue/tax base?
3.) For that matter, how on earth could one municipality even propose, from a legal standpoint, that it would graft a convention center onto a separate municipality? Would Somerville have any say in that?
Please, try to think a little before you post...
3) Putting the convention center in Everett is completely absurd. It works fine where it is with the neighborhood building up around it.
Nothing is absurd if properly thought out and planned correctly