F-Line to Dudley
Senior Member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2010
- Messages
- 9,261
- Reaction score
- 9,265
Yea seattle is spending 54 BILLION on line additions and 550 million on new cars. Its outrageous. The question though is why cant we even kick the tires on a half mile tunnel for not even 1% of that that we are going to be in dire need of in short order. Im not saying match them and go for 50 billion ourselves, not at all.
If you think about it though they had their entire waterfront cutoff and a miniscule transit system. Im not sure what our total rail build out would cost in todays numbers but Id say right there or more. They had like 60 light rail cars total. We have like 150 on the Orange line. Im sure if we had to build an entire rail network itd be ungodly expensive too. So it seems to be more of the fact that theyre just catching up now along with building it in todays day n age when things are more expensive. They know that it has to get done though, so theyre doing it. I aint mad at it.
Anyways its just crazy that besides the glx using existing ROWs theres really nothing else going on. There has to be more were capable of we cant just build and build and ignore expanding transit even if the numbers may not be fun right now. We either grow it or car traffic will grind the city to a halt.
But...like I said, Seattle is doing it with MAJOR cost blowout problems, especially with the highway tunnel project. It is not the model city to be citing for a major short-term scale-up, because their own Big Dig syndrome is brewing as a result of this and will probably cast a chill on more projects over the next 20 years as they contend with a debt service much larger than they were prepared for.
It's not enough to get a lot of projects in the pipeline. It's got to be managed relatively cleanly, too, in order to be sustainable. Seattle ended up making a lot of the same budgeting mistakes 1990's Boston did, and is going to pay accordingly.