Today Drudge is running photo of Boston MT for article about sinking SF MT.
Is that old Barnes and Noble spot still empty?
Mass -- its just sitting there waiting for someone to come along and take advantage of a terrific location -- for something -- But for what???
Think a DTX "Beehive-style" establishment with better food, drink and music.
I'm with you on the concept, but don't you think the Beehive is expensive enough as it is? Is "better" going to mean $18 drinks instead of $13?
I'm with you on the concept, but don't you think the Beehive is expensive enough as it is? Is "better" going to mean $18 drinks instead of $13?
I've said this a dozen times before but I would love to see that space turned into a small live music venue/jazz club/restaurant/cocktail bar with seating for 300-500.
So that means, what--10,000 sf? 15,000 sf? That building is totally vacant, it's obvious--you never seen anyone entering or exiting over the years. And it's at least 4 stories. Assuming 15,000 sf per story, it's 60,000 sf, minimum. But probably more like 80,000 vacant sf.
The owner's been totally content letting that 80,000 sf sit vacant for years. What possible compulsion would they have to work hard to cultivate a tenant who would occupy a mere 20% of the space--and whose presence might in fact actively handicap efforts at renting the remaining 80% of the space?
Remember, the old B&N occupied the entire space--how easy was that, in comparison!
I am beginning to think we need a "blight surcharge" in property tax rates. Letting a prime location sit empty should be costly -- because it is a public nuisance and economic detriment to the neighborhood.